Last year I interviewed one of our formulation chemists for an article about the effect that hard water has on agchems. This article generated a lot of interest and we received a lot of questions, mostly about hard water and its effect on glyphosate efficacy. There is still a lot of confusion around the effect hard water has on glyphosate and how the addition of ammonium sulphate works.
Effect of hard water on glyphosate efficacy
Glyphosate is manufactured as an acid but is converted to various salt forms to improve its solubility in water. When dissolved in water in a spray tank these salts form positive and negatively charged ions. Under most conditions the glyphosate ion has a net charge of minus two (-2).
Hard water has high concentrations of calcium and magnesium ions. These ions mix with the glyphosate ions in the spray tank. When the glyphosate ions react with those in the hard water they can form calcium glyphosate or magnesium glyphosate (see Figure 1). These “salts” are poorly soluble in water and form crystals upon drying on plant foliage that lock up the glyphosate and can severely reduce efficacy.
The staff at Eureka! have been experimenting with glyphosate and hard water for more than 20 years and have accumulated a good understanding of their interaction.
Eureka! conducted a greenhouse study to compare the effect of 9 rates of a well-known brand of glyphosate 450 SL prepared in water of varying hardness on annual ryegrass. The spray mixes were prepared with Melbourne tap water (which is renowned for its softness) that had been modified to give four concentrations of hardness; tap water (32ppm hardness), 330ppm, 1,000ppm and 3,000ppm. Eight replicates, each containing two tillering, annual ryegrass plants, were sprayed at nine rates of glyphosate and harvested two weeks later.
Results and Discussion
A dose response analysis was used to evaluate the fresh weight data from all treatments. Figure 2 summarises data from these curves, including the ED50 (the Effective Dose that reduced the biomass of ryegrass by 50%). Table 1 also shows the calculated loss in glyphosate efficacy.
The efficacy of the glyphosate 450 SL was dramatically reduced by increasing water hardness. The rate of glyphosate active ingredient required to reduce the biomass of annual ryegrass by 50% (ED50) was 69 g a.i./ha in tap water and 540 g/ha in 3,000ppm hard water. The 330ppm hard water spray mix reduced the efficacy of glyphosate by 74% and this increased to 90% in 3000ppm hard water (Table 1). Such a reduction in efficacy practicably removes the product’s herbicidal activity.
Sulphate of ammonia and glyphosate efficacy in hard water
Ammonium sulphate is an excellent treatment for hard water problems with glyphosate. It is sometimes incorrectly referred to as a chelating agent. Whereas chelating agents “mop up” ions, ammonium sulphate mainly works by releasing sufficient ammonium ions into the tank to overwhelm the effect of the calcium and magnesium ions (Figure 3). The glyphosate salt then has far more ammonium ions to bind with than calcium or magnesium ions. Ammonium glyphosate is a desirable structure for glyphosate in terms of its herbicidal activity. It is very soluble and is more quickly absorbed into the plant than other glyphosate salts. However, in hard water it is possible to have more calcium and magnesium ions than a standard rate of ammonium sulphate can overcome.
In a second part of the above study we determined the benefit of ammonium sulfate application when mixed with hard water and glyphosate. In this case 533g ammonium sulphate/ha was added to the four water hardness options (equivalent to 834g ammonium sulphate/100L).
Results and Discussion
As above, dose response analysis including the ED50 was used to evaluate fresh weights of annual ryegrass 2 weeks after glyphosate treatment (Figure 4). Glyphosate efficacy loss (%) is shown in Table 2.
The rate of glyphosate active ingredient required for a 50% reduction in annual ryegrass biomass was 69 g a.i. in tap water and 501 g a.i. in 1,000ppm hard water. With the addition of ammonium sulphate to the 1,000ppm water the ED50 fell to 77 g a.i./ha. This was not significantly different (P<0.05) than the efficacy in soft water without ammonium sulphate.
However, at 3,000ppm hard water the same rate of ammonium sulphate was not sufficient to completely protect the glyphosate from the hard water ions and the efficacy was still 62% below that of the soft water.
Iron versus Calcium and Magnesium
In some parts of Australia hard water can also contain iron ions. Unfortunately, ammonium sulphate is not as effective in preventing efficacy losses with iron as it is with calcium and magnesium.
Some fertilisers have a similar effect on glyphosate as hard water, while others act more like ammonium sulphate. Fertilisers such as copper and zinc sulphates are an example of problems. These ions bind strongly to glyphosate and are applied in sufficient concentrations to overwhelm ammonium sulphate, especially as water hardness also increases.
Liquid fertilisers that contain ammonium are widely used in Australia and they can reduce the effect of hard water. However, they tend to have a pH around seven which is a problem for glyphosate. We will discuss the reasons why in a future article.
If you are interested in more information on what has been reported in this article you can contact Anthony Flynn
Written By: Anthony Flynn
© 2015 Eureka! AgResearch Pty Ltd